Your browser is ancient!
Upgrade to a different browser to experience this site.

Ratings and Reviews for Applied Text Mining in Python

Back to course Page

Reviews and Ratings

4.2

3,349 Ratings from Coursera

Reviews

Exceptional! I was using up to now strictly regular expressions for text mining, and that was a headache. This course opened a new whole world to me! I strongly recommend it to any one that wants to use ML to study texts
When looking at the full course in coursera, I was thinking that would be the course which would interest me the least, but at it turned out, now I'm really interested in text mining, and I'm planning to read more publication to understand that field
I like the lecturer.
Instructor does not explain concepts, just superficially goes through subjects. Some lectures lack coherence between subjects. you wouldn't know what is the relation between topics. But it introduces some basic stuff which worth knowing anyway.
Amazing assignments!
The content of this course has great potential, but needs significant refinement. The lectures, while delivered with enthusiasm, were very theoretical/academic and provided little in the way of preparation for the more practical exercises. The disconnect between lectures and assignments, coupled with technical challenges (autograder glitches) were frustrating. The only support came from one dedicated volunteer Coursera Mentor; the instructor cadre was absent or unavailable to students throughout the four week period. The topics of text mining and Natural Language Processing are central to data science, and deserve better instruction than this course delivered.
great explanation!
Unfortunately, this is one of the worst courses I have ever taken. The later lectures did not have much of a content, and assignments were very badly described and evaluated. The latter is in general one of the weaknesses of this specialisation, but this course made me particularly frustrated. There did not seem to be any moderator answering students' questions which at least in one case led to a big confusion as one of the students wrote that his wrongly (as I got it later) written code worked ok which led to a long and misleading discussion between students how to interpret and tweak the assignment to pass the grader, which made me waste a lot of time. Would be great if wrong interpretations and statements written by students are timely deleted, corrected or flagged. In summary, the assignments' descriptions and grading system do need to be improved (for example, one can introduce some hints such as 'the grader expected this output for this input0, but the student solution returned this' as it is done in a few other courses on Coursera).
Overall this is well done course, but the autograder for week 2 needs a lot of work. It was buggy, broken and gave uninformative answers.
The lessons are useful, and all of the knowledge is a must have. Some things could go deeper, some needed more explanation. As a result this is a must have course for text mining but I think that the level is introductory and in real world one must have more skills to perform a respected text mining.

Michigan Online
For You

Sign up for a Michigan Online account to customize your experience!