The most weak part is automatical grading. When structure and semantics are essential, text inside tag is not, guessing if exists space between elements isn't acceptable as well. Also it's difficult to check when long code snippets should be pasted as plan text in short text field. Better to use file uploading with required snippet. For me also not enough accent was on html 5 features with dedicated examples how use new tags and attributes.
Ratings and Reviews for Introduction to HTML5
Back to course Page
Reviews and Ratings
Reviews
Videos were OK, practice quizzes somewhat helpful. However, the final autograder quiz was extremely temperamental and gave no usable feedback. This resulted in frustration and made what should have been a good experience a very bad one.
Updated course to three stars since a change was made to be able to pass the final quiz without needing to pass the autograder submission.
This class is the perfect way to get familiar with HTML. I was completely inexperienced. After just the first two weeks, I feel like I have some understanding of code and how it works. If you are just starting out with code, this class is the way to begin!
This was one of the excellent course. A good quality fundamentals and concept oriented.
Really good Job:) Well Paced and awesome work :) Keep it up :) Thank You :)
excellent(sorry for my poor express ability)
This course was clearly not ready. The autograder for the final project was.. a complete fail. It was not a fun experience trying to change around my code to figure out what the autograder wanted.
I liked this course and the professor was good, just wished they gave an extra week.
Excellent course
Colleen is amazing teacher! This course is very good for the beginner like me, I like coding after I learn it :)